Unlock This Episode
Our Free plan includes 1 subscriber-only episode of your choice, plus weekly updates from our newsletter.
Recap
We now know that flatMap
is an important operation that solves a common problem. Important enough for Swift to provide this operation for arrays and optionals in the standard library.
However, all of the types we define for our own problems and applications, the ones that the Swift standard library knows nothing about, all have this nesting problem. The Result
, Validated
, Func
, Parallel
type and more. Can we define flatMap
on them?
The answer is “yes we can and should be!” And as you define flatMap
it uncovers interesting semantics of your types. It also will show interesting connections with zip
, and that is what clarifies the purpose of the type. For example, why would you use Result
over Validated
? Why would you use Func
over Parallel
? It turns out that the way flatMap
and zip
relate to each other uncovers all of that.
So let’s define flatMap
on our own types and see what it teaches us!
Subscribe to Point-Free
Access this episode, plus all past and future episodes when you become a subscriber.
Already a subscriber? Log in
References
SE-0235: Add Result to the Standard Library
Wednesday Nov 7, 2018The Swift evolution review of the proposal to add a Result
type to the standard library. It discussed many functional facets of the Result
type, including which operators to include (including map
and flatMap
), and how they should be defined.
Railway Oriented Programming — error handling in functional languages
Scott Wlaschin • Wednesday Jun 4, 2014This talk explains a nice metaphor to understand how flatMap
unlocks stateless error handling.
When you build real world applications, you are not always on the “happy path”. You must deal with validation, logging, network and service errors, and other annoyances. How do you manage all this within a functional paradigm, when you can’t use exceptions, or do early returns, and when you have no stateful data?
This talk will demonstrate a common approach to this challenge, using a fun and easy-to-understand “railway oriented programming” analogy. You’ll come away with insight into a powerful technique that handles errors in an elegant way using a simple, self-documenting design.
A Tale of Two Flat‑Maps
Brandon Williams & Stephen Celis • Tuesday Mar 27, 2018Up until Swift 4.1 there was an additional flatMap
on sequences that we did not consider in this episode, but that’s because it doesn’t act quite like the normal flatMap
. Swift ended up deprecating the overload, and we discuss why this happened in a previous episode:
Swift 4.1 deprecated and renamed a particular overload of
flatMap
. What made thisflatMap
different from the others? We’ll explore this and how understanding that difference helps us explore generalizations of the operation to other structures and derive new, useful code!